Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
back
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Andrea Faliszewski wrote:

Greetings!

I have recently heard some arguments against the authority of the Bible saying it is unlikely that the Jewish leaders would have taken time away from their Passover celebration in order to conduct Jesus' trial.

  • How can I answer this?

I have also heard a counter-argument that the Pharisees and other Jewish leaders were on a slightly different calendar than the more common one Jews, such as Jesus and his disciples, would have been on so the Last Supper with Jesus would have been earlier in the week and the other Jews would have celebrated it after Jesus' Passion.

This answer explains a lot, especially the Bible's mention that the Pharisees wanted to kill Jesus before the Passover, but I don't know enough about this idea to use it as an argument.

  • Is there any historical evidence to back it up?
  • What does the Church say?

Thank you for your time and your ministry and God bless!

Andrea

  { Is there an argument against Biblical authority based on the timing of Passover events? }

Eric replied:

Hi Andrea,

The argument you mention seems to be a weak one.

Celebration of the Passover consisted of maybe three things:

  1. Purging the leaven
  2. Sacrificing a lamb, and
  3. Eating the Passover meal.

The first was probably done by the wives.

The second was done by the priests on duty, not necessarily all the leaders of the Jews (though it also required selecting a lamb, but that could be done ahead of time, and could readily be bought from a merchant or again, even by the wives).

The third was done at a specific time, at night, and again the women likely would have prepared it. Besides, Jesus was busy with his own Passover meal. If the Jews wanted to try Jesus badly enough, they could have done it.

What you have here is a bunch of vague, unproven innuendo that doesn't mean anything substantial.

  • So what if it was unlikely anyway?

That doesn't mean it was impossible; all it means is that by one person's logic, it would seem not to make the most sense. That doesn't prove anything.

Eric Ewanco

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.