|
 |
Kevin
Terry
wrote:
|
Mike,
I got another question for you. I tried looking on your site, but did not see anything
that pertains to this. It may have been on there, right in front of my face, but
I didn't see it. I have tried to start looking on your site for answers
prior to asking you. That way you don't have to answer the same questions again
and again.
I have heard people say that the Catholic Church was given to all of the people who
were united as one, and not the Roman Catholic Church.
Basically they are saying
that the Catholic Church, or the Early Church, is not the same as the Roman Catholic
Church as we know it today.
- Can you comment on their statement and help me to defend what we believe?
Peace,
K.T.
|
{
Is the Catholic Church or Early Church the same as the Roman Catholic Church? }
|
Mike replied:
Hi Kevin,
Simple question, simple answer:
- Is the Early Church the same as the Roman Catholic
Church?
Yes!
You said:
I have heard people say that the Catholic Church was given to all of the people who
were united as one, and not the Roman Catholic Church.
Basically they are saying
that the Catholic Church, or the Early Church, is not the same as the Roman Catholic
Church as we know it today.
- Can you comment on their statement and help me to defend what we believe?
I created a new web site that addresses this issue atBibleBeltCatholics.com.
Check out this section:
My colleague Eric, in another answer stated:
Interesting factoid, though: The first use of the term Catholic is
in 110 A.D., where St. Ignatius of Antioch, a martyr later thrown
to the lions, wrote to a church in Asia Minor. There he said:
Where the bishop is, there let the people gather; just as
where ever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.
Some articles that you may find of interest:
If your friends looked into the writings
of the Early Church Fathers I believe they would be surprised
at how Catholic the Early Church Fathers were.
- Why? <Because they were!>
I could agree with what they are saying to a certain extent.
- Is the essence of an acorn also in an Oak tree? <Sure!>
The difference:
The development and growth of the acorn into an Oak tree.
The same is true of the Church:
Development and growth of doctrinal teachings over time especially during the early Church when the Church had to deal with heretics and heresy. Nevertheless, the difference is development, growth and clarification, not mutation or change of Her Teachings.
The Church was given by Christ as the saving means for all mankind.
He created every one for a specific purpose in life. Our goal, no
matter what faith we are born into, is to glorify Him by being faithful
to the natural law that has been written in our hearts.
For the non-Christian this entails the basics:
- Do unto others, as you would want to be done to you, and
- being open to what Christianity has to offer for your own salvation.
For the Christian this entails the Christian basics like:
- obeying the Ten Commandments
- studying the Holy Scriptures and knowing the history of your
current faith/denomination
- seeking the fullness of the Christian Faith that can only be
found in the Church Our Lord established on St. Peter.
For the Catholic this entails discerning the specific calling and
ministry the Lord has given to us in the Church, while obviously
striving to live a sacramental, prayerful life.
Without a regular prayer life, Satan and his group of invisible demonic
spirits will be able to persuade us to go off the Catholic
Christian path. Nevertheless, we have to remember that the Church also consists
of holy angels to help us against these demonic spirits. This
is why prayer and acknowledgment of demonic, evil spirits, along
with the Holy ones is important.
I've heard young people on TV talk about bad thoughts or impulses
they are receiving. It may be of a homosexual nature or a nature
where they wish to harm another person. Often they say,
"That
they don't know where this is coming from."
Although there are
exceptions for people with mental illnesses, my answer is: That's
an easy one:
The demonic is trying to persuade you to do things against
your Christian nature. A Christian nature that is marked on your
soul by Baptism.
If we just think of the spiritual Christian life as me and the Holy
Spirit, we can be lead astray by a spirit we think is holy, but isn't. Regular prayer and discernment are needed.
Hope this helps,
Mike
|
John
replied:
Hi Kevin,
The term Roman Catholic applies strictly to the Latin
Rite Church, however, it has been used interchangeably with
the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.
The One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church includes many Churches besides the Roman
Catholic Church.
There are any number of Churches that are in complete union with Rome but retain
names such as:
- Melkite Catholic
- Ukrainian Catholic
- Syriac Catholic, and
- Coptic Catholic
just to name a few. They all make up the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. To a lesser degree the
Eastern Churches which are in schism are also part of the Church but not fully.
All the ecclesial communities which came about as a result of the Reformation are
connected to the one true Church by virtue of their:
- profession of Christ
- their belief in the Trinity,
and
- a common baptism
but these communities don't share the other sacraments. There
is less of a connection with these sects, but they are brothers in Christ.
John
|
Mary
Ann replied:
Hi John,
A slight correction to an inadvertent error.
Roman Catholic
applies to the whole Catholic Church. The Eastern Rite
Catholics of various branches are in union with Rome.
There is only one Church but there are several rites within
the Catholic Church — the ones that you mentioned. They
are not referred to as separate Churches.
The only way
we would use the term Church locally is the way in which
the New Testament and the Fathers use it: the Church
in Athens, in America, in Constantinople, etc.
Mary Ann
|
John
replied:
I beg to differ on the semantics. The Roman Catholic Church applies to
Her Western Rite Mary Ann; the term has been misused.
The Melkite's are not Roman Catholics; they are Melkite
Catholics and part of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. They have their
own Patriarchy and their own Canon Law.
The Roman Church does not interfere in their
operations so operationally they are separate and equal churches within the one
Church. Conversely, their clergy does not, as a rule, participate in the College of
Cardinals that elect the Bishop of Rome though there are exceptions to that.
Further, their theological expression of the same truths varies from the Latin Rite. While they are in union with Rome and recognize the absolute primacy of the Pope,
they remain independent.
John
|
Mary Ann replied:
Hi John,
You said:
While they are in union with Rome and recognize the absolute primacy of the Pope ...
That is what Roman Catholic means. All Catholics recognize the primacy of the See
of Rome. Those who do not (Polish Catholics, Old Catholics, Orthodox) are not Catholic.
All the Eastern Churches in union with Rome, while they have their Patriarchs, are
part of the Roman Catholic Church.
You went on to say that they remain independent. Well, in some jurisdictional
and ritual matters they are, but they are not truly independent. They are part of the Church and recognize
the Roman See as the See of Peter and first in jurisdiction.
Mary Ann
|
John replied:
Mary Ann,
We are arguing semantics. The fact is the Roman Church
is the Latin Rite Church.
Yes, in the vernacular people call the entire
Church the Roman Catholic Church but it is not accurate nomenclature.
The only church other than the Roman Church which has succession
from Peter is the Melkite Church, because Peter left Antioch
after appointing a successor and then went on to Rome.
If for some reason, he had never made it to Rome and appointed
another successor there,
the Bishop of Antioch would be the
Pope.
John
|
|
|
|