Bringing you the
"Good News" of Jesus Christ
and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC
Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's
magisterium
My name is Lorenzo Gallegos and I live in Corrales,
New Mexico, just outside of Albuquerque.
Why is it okay to vote for political candidates
that openly support abortions?
Thank you,
Lorenzo
{
Why is it okay to vote for political
candidates that openly support abortions? }
Mike replied:
Hi Lorenzo,
It is not OK, even if they claim to be Catholic!
The Church and, more recently the Catholic Bishops in the Untied States,
have stated that voting for any candidate that openly supports abortion is contrary
to Catholic teaching and Catholic practice.
For any Catholic to vote for a political candidate that openly supports abortion
is to become a Protestant, no matter what they call themselves.
The Church Jesus established on St. Peter and His successors is a
Pro-Life Church because Jesus is:
the Way, the Truth, and The Life; not no Life.
I hope this answers your question.
Mike
Lorenzo replied:
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
You said: . . . for any candidate that openly supports abortion is contrary
to Catholic teaching and Catholic practice.
Since this is contrary to Catholic teaching, is it a sin?
If it is a sin, why are we not hearing any of this in Catholic sermons
every Sunday?
I have been a Catholic for 61 years and
have heard every possible angle on love, love, love, but nothing about what
is means to live as a Catholic.
I am greatly bothered that many of our Catholics believe that their salvation will be secured
by:
going to Mass
being a Deacon, or
receiving Holy Communion every Sunday
with a total disregard how they lead live the rest of the week and carry out their
duties as Catholics.
One of the family members on my wife's side has been
a Deacon for several years and apparently believes that voting for political
candidates who openly support abortion, such as Hillary Clinton and Obama
is not a Catholic concern.
Even though I may not entirely agree with everything President Bush has
done or is doing,
his appointment of several Supreme Court Justices, who are Catholics,
will be making an impact on our country 30 to 40 years in the future. His
veto of the stem cell bill is something no other current political candidate
would have done. His signing of the law against Partial-Birth Abortion would
not have been done by current and past political candidates.
Lorenzo
Mike replied:
Hi Lorenzo,
Your Deacon relative is a good example of how uncatechized the Church is, even among
some of the clergy. He appears to have fell into Practical Atheism.
A good friend of mine, Clayton Bower Jr., a fellow Catholic apologist who passed away a few years ago, gave a very good talk titled: Atheism's Weakness. Let me dedicate what he said in his memory.
First, we have to state that all Atheism is dogmatic.
Why?
Because the very definition of Atheism
itself requires one dogma or solemn
teaching. One must believe:
That God does not exist.
Without this dogma, Atheism falls
flat on its face.
These days you often hear an introduction
to Atheism from a group that calls
themselves the New Atheists. The problem is there
is nothing new about what they are
saying. The term the New Atheists is just a re-marketed
term to sell their dogmatic belief.
There are three types of Atheism
in the world today:
Philological Atheism, otherwise
known as Agnosticism
Psychological or Adolescent Atheism, and
Practical Atheism
Philosophical Atheism or Agnosticism
We can admire those who sincerely
hold on to a form of philological
atheism.
Why?
Because they sincerely
are unsure of whether God really
exists, yet are open to someone
showing them, for example, the Five Proofs of St. Thomas Aquinas.
They are a class of faith-seekers who honestly cannot find acceptable answers for why God would exist. This can be justified and understandable based on one's background.
Psychological or Adolescent Atheism
Those who hold to a psychological or adolescent
atheism, don't
really believe there is no God.
Most of the time, kids in their
teens hold on to this form of
atheism.
It is more of a rebellion against
their parents in the younger years
of their life. Since their
parents demand they believe in
God, they rebel and deny His existence,
though many times, they aren't
even at an age where they can
form their conscience correctly.
When they grow older, and especially
have a family, their denial of
the existence of God usually disappears.
This type of atheism is based, not so much on a true cognitive belief that there is no God, but is a reaction to overbearing religious parents and teachers just to get under their skin. Adolescent Atheism is a reaction to parental or adult demands. There is no real in-depth study of whether God exists, or not. The teenager or youth rebel just to identify themselves and their own identity. They are basically saying: I'm not like this overbearing parent.
Practical Atheism
Practical Atheism is probably
the most widely spread form of Atheism
today without people being conscious
that they fall into this camp.
There's an old saying:
If you were arrested for being a Christian (or a Catholic), would there be enough evidence against you?
. . . and a bumper sticker on the car or a Rosary in the window wouldn't be enough.
How do our words and actions from
Monday through Saturday reflect
Catholic Christian principles?
If they hardly reflect them, we
are practical atheists.
Practical Atheism says, We can go about knowing there is a God, but behaving like there isn't one.
That said, who we say we are, and what we do, should go hand in hand for anyone who calls themselves a Christian.
I've met people who call themselves Christians but have no problem supporting abortion and so-called gay marriage (There is no such thing as gay marriage.) Their life is a lie.
When someone lives a life where their words contradict their actions, their credibility or believability goes down . . . No matter what they say, they are Practical Atheists.
Clayton Bower Jr.
R.I.P. February 21, 1950 to September
13, 2010
What some people do, like your deacon-relative, is play personal
pope. In doing so, they bring the Church down spiritually and
publicly scandalize the Church by their words, actions, and behaviors.
The hard thing to discern, and this will vary from person to person, is
how to show him, with love and charity, that his political words and actions
scandalize Jesus and the Church He founded on
St. Peter and his successors.
It really requires personal prayer time. Take some time to let the Lord plant on
your heart the best plan of action.
Your deacon relative has no excuse because John McCain is far more pro-life
then any Democrat who has run in the past 10 or more years for
the presidency.
Catholics who support and will vote for Obama
will be accountable for their pro-child killing vote come their particular
judgment. Obama has the financial backing of all the abortion organizations.
In 2008, the Christian who is wondering, What would Jesus do? has
an easy choice.
God is pro-life; Jesus is pro-life; and John McCain is
pro-life.
Any Democratic Presidential nominee would never be pro-life; but anti-life.
To order a copy of this statement, please visit the (USCCB) United States Conference of Catholic Bishops web site and
in the upper right-hand corner search on Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship using the by Titles option.
Under: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil
21. Aided by the virtue of prudence in the exercise of well-formed consciences,
Catholics are called to make practical judgments regarding good and evil
choices in the political arena.
34. Catholics often face difficult choices about how to vote. This is
why it is so important to vote according to a well-formed conscience
that perceives the proper relationship among moral goods. A Catholic
cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic
evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter's intent is to support
that position. In such cases a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation
in grave evil. At the same time, a voter should not use a candidate's
opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify indifference or inattentiveness
to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity.
If intrinsic evil then it would appear to either be a sin or not a sin.
I think the American Bishops did not fulfill their responsibility, deliberately,
so not to offend Catholics, by leaving this issue up in the air. I think
the Bishops are not fulfilling their responsibilities in shepherding
their people, and because of this failure, the Pope should then take
on their responsibilities.
I know the commonly accepted answer is to pray about it but our religious
leaders have a God given duty to inform rather than just leaving everything
up to us. We all know what happens when it is left up to us.
Sincerely yours
Lorenzo Gallegos
Mike replied:
Thanks Lorenzo!
I'm sure our web site visitors will look into this source as the
Presidential election falls upon us.
Mike
Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey