Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines and Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life, Dating, and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
back
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History


Lorenzo Gallegos wrote:

Hi, guys —

My name is Lorenzo Gallegos and I live in Corrales, New Mexico, just outside of Albuquerque.

  • Why is it okay to vote for political candidates that openly support abortions?

Thank you,

Lorenzo

  { Why is it okay to vote for political candidates that openly support abortions? }

Mike replied:

Hi Lorenzo,

It is not OK, even if they claim to be Catholic!

The Church and, more recently the Catholic Bishops in the Untied States, have stated that voting for any candidate that openly supports abortion is contrary to Catholic teaching and Catholic practice.

For any Catholic to vote for a political candidate that openly supports abortion is to become a Protestant, no matter what they call themselves.

The Church Jesus established on St. Peter and His successors is a Pro-Life Church because Jesus is:

the Way, the Truth, and The Life; not no Life.

I hope this answers your question.

Mike

Lorenzo replied:

Hi Mike,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

You said:
. . . for any candidate that openly supports abortion is contrary to Catholic teaching and Catholic practice.

  • Since this is contrary to Catholic teaching, is it a sin?
  • If it is a sin, why are we not hearing any of this in Catholic sermons every Sunday?

I have been a Catholic for 61 years and have heard every possible angle on love, love, love, but nothing about what is means to live as a Catholic.

I am greatly bothered that many of our Catholics believe that their salvation will be secured by:

  • going to Mass
  • being a Deacon, or
  • receiving Holy Communion every Sunday

with a total disregard how they lead live the rest of the week and carry out their duties as Catholics.

One of the family members on my wife's side has been a Deacon for several years and apparently believes that voting for political candidates who openly support abortion, such as Hillary Clinton and Obama is not a Catholic concern.

Even though I may not entirely agree with everything President Bush has done or is doing,
his appointment of several Supreme Court Justices, who are Catholics, will be making an impact on our country 30 to 40 years in the future. His veto of the stem cell bill is something no other current political candidate would have done. His signing of the law against Partial-Birth Abortion would not have been done by current and past political candidates.

Lorenzo

Mike replied:

Hi Lorenzo,

Your Deacon relative is a good example of how uncatechized the Church is, even among some of the clergy. He appears to have fell into Practical Atheism.

A good friend of mine, Clayton Bower Jr., a fellow Catholic apologist who passed away a few years ago, gave a very good talk titled: Atheism's Weakness. Let me dedicate what he said in his memory.

First, we have to state that all Atheism is dogmatic.

  • Why?

Because the very definition of Atheism itself requires one dogma or solemn teaching. One must believe:

  • That God does not exist.

Without this dogma, Atheism falls flat on its face.

These days you often hear an introduction to Atheism from a group that calls themselves the New Atheists. The problem is there is nothing new about what they are saying. The term the New Atheists is just a re-marketed term to sell their dogmatic belief.

There are three types of Atheism in the world today:

  • Philological Atheism, otherwise known as Agnosticism
  • Psychological or Adolescent Atheism, and
  • Practical Atheism

Philosophical Atheism or Agnosticism

We can admire those who sincerely hold on to a form of philological atheism.

  • Why?

Because they sincerely are unsure of whether God really exists, yet are open to  someone showing them, for example, the Five Proofs of St. Thomas Aquinas.

They are a class of faith-seekers who honestly cannot find acceptable answers for why God would exist. This can be justified and understandable based on one's background.

Psychological or Adolescent Atheism

Those who hold to a psychological or adolescent atheism, don't really believe there is no God. Most of the time, kids in their teens hold on to this form of atheism.

It is more of a rebellion against their parents in the younger years of their life.  Since their parents demand they believe in God, they rebel and deny His existence, though many times, they aren't even at an age where they can form their conscience correctly. When they grow older, and especially have a family, their denial of the existence of God usually disappears.

This type of atheism is based, not so much on a true cognitive belief that there is no God, but is a reaction to overbearing religious parents and teachers just to get under their skin. Adolescent Atheism is a reaction to parental or adult demands. There is no real in-depth study of whether God exists, or not. The teenager or youth rebel just to identify themselves and their own identity. They are basically saying: I'm not like this overbearing parent.

Practical Atheism

Practical Atheism is probably the most widely spread form of Atheism today without people being conscious that they fall into this camp. There's an old saying:

  • If you were arrested for being a Christian (or a Catholic), would there be enough evidence against you?

. . . and a bumper sticker on the car or a Rosary in the window wouldn't be enough.

  • How do our words and actions from Monday through Saturday reflect Catholic Christian principles?

If they hardly reflect them, we are practical atheists.

Practical Atheism says, We can go about knowing there is a God, but behaving like there isn't one.

That said, who we say we are, and what we do, should go hand in hand for anyone who calls themselves a Christian.

I've met people who call themselves Christians but have no problem supporting abortion and so-called gay marriage (There is no such thing as gay marriage.) Their life is a lie.

When someone lives a life where their words contradict their actions, their credibility or believability goes down . . . No matter what they say, they are Practical Atheists.

Clayton Bower Jr.
R.I.P. February 21, 1950 to September 13, 2010

What some people do, like your deacon-relative, is play personal pope. In doing so, they bring the Church down spiritually and publicly scandalize the Church by their words, actions, and behaviors.

The hard thing to discern, and this will vary from person to person, is how to show him, with love and charity, that his political words and actions scandalize Jesus and the Church He founded on
St. Peter and his successors. It really requires personal prayer time. Take some time to let the Lord plant on your heart the best plan of action.

Your deacon relative has no excuse because John McCain is far more pro-life then any Democrat who has run in the past 10 or more years for the presidency.

Catholics who support and will vote for Obama will be accountable for their pro-child killing vote come their particular judgment. Obama has the financial backing of all the abortion organizations.

In 2008, the Christian who is wondering, What would Jesus do? has an easy choice.

God is pro-life; Jesus is pro-life; and John McCain is pro-life.

Any Democratic Presidential nominee would never be pro-life; but anti-life.

Remember, Peace begins in the mother's womb.

Hope this helps,

Mike

Lorenzo replied:

Dear Mike:

Thank you for your reply.

I have included some material that your audience may find helpful.

From Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship
A Call to Political Responsibility from the Catholic Bishops of the United States

Issued by USCCB, November 14, 2007
Copyright © 2007, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. All rights reserved.

To order a copy of this statement, please visit the (USCCB) United States Conference of Catholic Bishops web site and in the upper right-hand corner search on Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship using the by Titles option.

Under: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil

21. Aided by the virtue of prudence in the exercise of well-formed consciences, Catholics are called to make practical judgments regarding good and evil choices in the political arena.

34. Catholics often face difficult choices about how to vote. This is why it is so important to vote according to a well-formed conscience that perceives the proper relationship among moral goods. A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter's intent is to support that position. In such cases a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil. At the same time, a voter should not use a candidate's opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity.

If intrinsic evil then it would appear to either be a sin or not a sin. I think the American Bishops did not fulfill their responsibility, deliberately, so not to offend Catholics, by leaving this issue up in the air. I think the Bishops are not fulfilling their responsibilities in shepherding their people, and because of this failure, the Pope should then take on their responsibilities.

I know the commonly accepted answer is to pray about it but our religious leaders have a God given duty to inform rather than just leaving everything up to us. We all know what happens when it is left up to us.

Sincerely yours

Lorenzo Gallegos

Mike replied:

Thanks Lorenzo!

I'm sure our web site visitors will look into this source as the Presidential election falls upon us.

Mike

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.