Cheryl,

The first thing we have to realize is that St. Bridget's revelation is not official Church teaching. It is simply a private revelation and like all private revelations, it is not binding on Catholics.

Now I'm not too familiar with her revelation per se but I can tell you that private revelations often get misrepresented by those that follow them. For instance, Fatima is an approved revelation, but the message of Our Lady was clear and concise. Those who get caught up in chasing apparitions often tell me all sorts of thing that Our Lady allegedly said that are not part of the revelation.

As for Limbo, it's not official doctrine. It's a medieval attempt to explain what happens to unbaptized children who did not have time to commit personal sin. The reason it developed is because Western Catholicism in the Middle Ages fell into the trap of viewing salvation through a juridical lens.

The Church however acknowledges a baptism of desire. That same principle applies to infants. That doesn't preclude the idea that there is some transitory state for unbaptized infants. We know in the end, there will only be Heaven and Hell. Purgatory will end with the Second Coming, as will Limbo, if indeed, such a place or condition exists.

As for the eternal disposition of Judas, I would say the Church doesn't have much hope that he repented and was saved. Nevertheless, She has not said he is in Hell dogmatically. Scripture does seem to indicate that he is there but since judgment belongs to God, the Church will not presume to make such a declaration.

John